Activity Listings
- LP's reply: He does not recommend this paper for publication because there is no justification for the central equation. [Filed under C: Organizational Correspondence, Box #68]
- Letter from LP to A. L. Wirin of Wirin, Rissman & Okran RE: Enclosed check in amount of Wirin's fee [Wirin's letter to LP April 6, 1954] [LP Biographical: Box 2.010, Folder 10.2]
- Letter from LP to Raymond K. Sheline. [Sheline's letter April 26, 1954] [Filed under S: Correspondence 1954, Box #379.2]
5 May 1954
Prof. Raymond K. Sheline
The Florida State University
Tallahassee, Florida
Dear Professor Sheline:
I am pleased to have your letter and I look forward to receiving the sample of 5 grams of dicobalt octacarbonyl, prepared by Dr. Sternberg of the U.S. Bureau of Mines. We shall plan to purify the material as recommended in your letter.
I thank you for the copy of your paper on the infrared studies of dicobalt octacarbonyl. I read the manuscript yesterday, and in the course of reading it I thought of another structure, which you have not considered. I have not yet carefully checked the infrared spectrum predicted for this structure, but I shall let you know as soon as this is done.
Sincerely yours,
Linus Pauling:W
- Letter from W. Albert Noyes, Jr., Editor of The Journal of Physical Chemistry to LP RE: Cook's manuscript, "Band Energy Relations in Solids," enclosed for evaluation.
- Note from Fred Sanger to LP RE: Thanking LP for his congratulations on Sanger's F.R.S. Also, Sanger is anticipating LP's results from his work on collagen [Filed under S: Individual Correspondence, Box #357.3]
- Telegram from LP to Raymond K. Sheline RE: Additional structure for dicobalt octacarbonyl. [LP's next letter May 7, 1954] [Filed under S: Correspondence 1954, Box #379.2]
|
May
5, 1954
