Activity Listings
- Letter from Dr. Sterling B. Hendricks to LP RE: Hendricks is organizing a program on DNA structure for the spring meeting of the Academy and discusses some details with LP, as he will serve as Chairman of the segment. He wishes LP to determine the program and the speakers and whether Watson or Crick would be better to have (LP notes Crick would be better). [LP's reply February 25, 1954] [Filed under LP Science: (National Academy of Sciences, 1952-1954), Box #14.020, Folder 20.3]
- Letter from LP to Dr. A. V. Astin, Acting Director, National Bureau of Standards RE: Enclosed letter to Wagman about the value of enthalpy of atomic boron given in the Circular. He also thanks the N.B.S. for preparing the book. [Filed under W: Correspondence 1954, Box #444.2]
- Letter from LP to Dr. Donald T. Wagman, National Bureau of Standards. [Wagman's reply March 10, 1954] [Filed under W: Correspondence 1954, Box #444.2]
22 February 1954
Dr. Donald T. Wagman
National Bureau of Standards
Washington 25, D.C.
Dear Dr. Wagman:
I am writing to ask about a value in Circular of the National Bureau of Standards 500; namely, the value given for the enthalpy of atomic boron.
On page 13 the enthalpy of atomic boron at 25° C is given as 97.2 kcal/mole. On page 939 the only specific reference for this value is Footnote 2, which reads "2. Calculated."
I have recently been making another effort to decide between the high value and the low value for the heat of sublimation of graphite, and in the course of this work I made a prediction of the heat of sublimation of boron. My predicted value for boron is 126.3 kcal/mole. This is not much different from the value 115 given in 1936 by Bichowsky and Rossini. They say in their book that the value is based upon their estimate of the heat of vaporization of boron.
My value is, however, considerably larger than the value 97.2 given in the Bureau of Standards Bulletin. The fact that your value is recorded to 0.1 kcal/mole suggests that it is more than an estimate. I shall be grateful to you for information on this point, and for your advice as to how much weight I should place on the Bureau of Standards value.
I notice that a considerable number of values have the same specific reference - the designation as calculated. I have not found a statement in the Bulletin about the significance of these values; perhaps you can point it out to me, or tell me what significance should in general be given to them.
With thanks, I am
Sincerely yours,
Linus Pauling:W
- Letter from LP to Prof. H. L. Johnston, Ohio State University RE: Requests information about the heat of sublimation of boron. [Reply from Secretary March 8, 1954;Michael Hoch March 9, 1954] [Filed under J: Individual Correspondence 1954, Box #190.2]
- Letter from LP to Prof. P. Goldfinger, UC Berkeley RE: LP asks Goldfinger's opinion on enclosed paper on the heat of sublimation of graphite. [Filed under G Correspondence 1954, Box #140.18]
- Letter from R. V. Bartz, Executive Director, C. I. T., to David T. Shoemaker, M. I. T., cc: LP RE: Informs that LP feels his presence, at the meeting on the structure of metals and alloys, would contribute to its success [Filed under LP Biographical: Box # 1.028, Folder #28.3].
|