Activity Listings
- Letter from Dr. Edwin McMillan to Dr. Addis RE: Updates Dr. Addis on LP's condition, noting that he is seeing him every two weeks and that there have been no remarkable changes. Includes pertinent data and lab results. There is a pen and crayon drawing in the upper left hand corner. [Filed under LP Correspondence: Box #2.1, file:(Addis, Thomas 1940-1945)]
- Letter from Helen Stewart Doane, Chairman of Pasadena Branch, to Marshal Field, President of United States Committee for the Care of European Children, Inc. RE: discusses tasks completed after the discontinuation of the Pasadena branch of Committee for the Care of European Children, Inc. [Filed under AHP: Assorted Political Materials, 1940-1960: Box # 5.011, Folder 11.6]
- Letter from LP to Dr. C. R. McCrosky, Department of Chemistry, Syracuse University, RE: Replies that he wrote Mr. Tien on January 30th informing him that it was unlikely he would receive an appointment. Requests McCrosky inform Tien that they will be unable to give him an appointment. [Letter from McCrosky to LP May 14, 1941] [Filed under LP Correspondence: Box #255.8, file:(M: Correspondence, 1941)]
- Letter from LP to Dr. John Beach RE: Replies that he will let him know of any openings; hopes that he will be in Pasadena when Beach visits. [Letter from Beach to LP May 14, 1941] [Filed under LP Correspondence: Box #27.1, file:(Beach, John Y., 1937-1941, 1958)]
- Letter from LP to Dr. Ronald Gurney RE: Apologizes for the delay in response due to his recent illness. Adds that he has not yet had time to attend to Gurney's letter, but will write when able. March 19, 1941] [Filed under LP Correspondence: Box #140.6, file:(G: Correspondence, 1941)]
- Letter from LP to Dr. William H. Jones, Department of Chemistry, Emory University, RE: Replies that early September is fine for Jones' arrival in Pasadena. Cautions him not to travel too rapidly, especially if he plans to come by car. [Letters from Jones to LP May 21, 1941, July 5, 1941] [Filed under LP Correspondence: Box #192.8, file:(J: Correspondence, 1941)]
- Letter from LP to J. Paul Youtz RE: Answers letter regarding National Bureau of Standards and says CIT is in a position to make tests. [Letter from J. Paul Youtz to LP May 20, 1941] [Filed under California Institute of Technology: Materials re: Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, 1933-1963, No Date: Box #1.024, Folder 24.9]
- Letter from LP to Longmans, Green, and Co. RE: Thanks them for the copy of Schlesinger's “General Chemistry.” Adds that he has decided not to use it for his freshman class. [Letter from Longmans, Green, and Co. to LP February 25, 1941] [Filed under LP Correspondence: Box #230.7, file:(L: Correspondence, 1941)]
- Manuscript: “The process of denaturation and renaturation of proteins” by Linus Pauling [Filed under: RNB 17R: Addendum]
The Process of Denaturation and Renaturation of Proteins. Linus Pauling. May 26, 1941
Proteins under the influence of certain conditions or reagents undergo certain changes; this process is called denaturation. Thus many naturally occurring proteins have certain specific properties - hemoglobin can combine with oxygen, pepsin can proteclize other proteins, etc. On denaturation these specific properties are lost in whole or in part.
It has been known for some years that some proteins after denaturation can, by the slow removal of the denaturating condition or reagent, be renatured to essentially their original form. This has been done, for example, by Anson and Mirsky for hemoglobin and trypsin.
A new idea is that proteins by suitable treatment may be denatured and then renatured to produce substances different from the original proteins, and with different properties. I was led to this idea by theoretical considerations. So far as I know, no one else has ever expressed the idea. An important feature of this treatment is that it avoids the undesirable properties (insolubility, etc.) resulting from denaturation alone.
Because of the extensive occurrence and use of proteins and their great importance to life and industry, there is the possibility that this proposed general method of treating a protein in such a way as to convert it into a substance with new and different properties may be of practical value. Some possible examples of usefulness are the following.
1. A normal protein might by suitable treatment be given a configuration complementary to that of another protein or other substance; that is, converted into a specific antibody to it. This suggestion is discussed further separately.
2. A native protein might be so changed as to lose certain immunological properties, without being otherwise denatured, permitting it to be used by patients who are sensitive to the original protein.
3. In particular this process might be carried out on serum or plasma fractions or other proteins used for transfusions, decreasing the danger of sensitization and shock.
4. A protein to which a patient is sensitive might be treated in such a way as to change to change in part its immunological properties, permitting it to be used more effectively and safely in desensitizing the patient.
5. The process might be applied to blood in such a way as to change the oxygen-combining power of hemoglobin and to make it more useful to certain patients.
6. The digestibility of a food protein might be increased by this treatment.
7. The solubility or other physical properties of a protein might be changed by this treatment in such a way as to make it more useful.
8. A protein might by suitable treatment be given the power of combining with some chemical substance and thus acting as a carrier for this substance or increasing its solubility or combining with it to diminish its activity.
9. The enzymatic activity of a protein might be usefully increased or changed or decreased by this treatment.
- Propositions Submitted by Maurice Jay Schlatter for the PhD Oral Examination. [LP Biographical CIT: Materials re: Teaching and Advising of Graduate Students by Linus Pauling, 1935-1963: Box #1.016, Folder 16.1]
- Propositions Submitted by William Thomas Stewart for the PhD Oral Examination. [LP Biographical CIT: Materials re: Teaching and Advising of Graduate Students by Linus Pauling, 1935-1963: Box #1.016, Folder 16.1]
- Record of LP's diet while ill with nephritis. Breakfast: ½ cantaloupe, 2 shredded wheat. ½ c cream, ½ c milk, 4 T cream, 1 sq butter, 4 t sugar, 2 c coffee / Lunch: 1 ½ eggnog, 1 apple, 1 chocolate bar, coca-cola / Dinner: 1 cu cheese, 1 corn, ½ c milk, 1 biscuit, ½ c strawberries, 1/4 c cream, lemonade. Note: “I gave Linus a 1" cube of Jack cheese from Mexico for dinner. He was crazy about it”. [Filed under LP Correspondence: Box #3.1, file:(Record of LP's diet while ill with nephritis kept by Ava Helen Pauling, 1941-1942.)]
|