|
During the mid-1950s, Pauling started campaigning for world peace by discussing the science behind nuclear weapons and the
potential health hazards of nuclear fallout. In 1963 he was awarded the 1962 Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts. In the late
1950s and 1960s, Pauling occasionally mentioned molecular disease when talking about the repercussions caused by nuclear fallout
and typically drew one connection between the two topics – genetic mutations and their resultant birth defects. By discussing
radiation’s infliction of human suffering through mutagenic effects and potential health hazards, Pauling substantiated his
call for world peace and a ban on nuclear weapons testing.
To clarify his point about molecular diseases, Pauling discussed sickle cell anemia. By this time, Pauling could draw upon
the experimental work completed by Ingram in 1956 and 1957 in which Ingram had ascertained the difference between sickle cell
hemoglobin and normal hemoglobin. Ingram had found that of the 300 amino acid residues in hemoglobin, only one differs; whereas
normal hemoglobin has a glutamic acid at one of its loci, sickle cell hemoglobin has valine at the same locus. According to
Pauling, Ingram’s work gave credence to the idea that a gene mutation altered the amino acid sequence of hemoglobin, which
in turn changed its structure and caused sickle cell anemia.
Although the historical circumstances behind the gene mutation from normal to sickle cell hemoglobin could not be determined,
Pauling used the example of sickle cell anemia to show how the replacement of one amino acid produced molecular disease in
humans. In other words, if the replacement of one amino acid in hundreds could cause the deadly disease sickle cell anemia,
then the potential hazard from gene mutations caused by nuclear fallout could cause comparable suffering or worse.
|
|
Click images to enlarge
 Flyer for Pauling lectures on the “Origin of Molecular Biology and Molecular Medicine”, and “No More War”, University of Alabama,
Birmingham, May 20, 1986.
“If the bomb testing had gone on at the same rate for a few more years, it would have meant that,…according to my calculations,
which seem to have been essentially right, millions of children, infants, would have been born with gross physical and mental
defects that otherwise would not have had the defect and millions of people would have died of cancer at an earlier age than
otherwise.”
- Linus Pauling, interview with Neil A. Campbell, Bioscience, v. 36, no. 11. December 1986
|